Invasion History
First Non-native North American Tidal Record: 1987First Non-native West Coast Tidal Record: 1987
First Non-native East/Gulf Coast Tidal Record:
General Invasion History:
Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was described from the Yangtze River region of China (Orsi and Walter 1991). Its native range is from the 'northern South China Sea' (Huang 2001) to the Yangtze River and the 'western Taiwan Strait' (Huang 2001). It has been reported from a freshwater lake in Japan, but this could be a misidentification of P. inopinus (Kikuchi 1928, cited by Orsi and Walter 1991).
North American Invasion History:
Invasion History on the West Coast:
In October 1987, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was first noticed in the San Joaquin River, California between Stockton and the mouth of the Mokelumne River (in freshwater), and in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. In summer and fall of 1988, it was found abundantly throughout the Delta and in decreasing numbers into Suisun Bay, ranging from freshwater into salinity of 16 PSU (Orsi and Walter 1991). In 1987-1994, the peak abundance of P. forbesi occurred at 0.2-0.5 PSU, and it maintained its position in the estuary through tidally timed vertical migration (Kimmerer et al. 1998). Pseudodiaptomus forbesi has fluctuated in abundance, but remains the dominant calanoid copepod in the fresh-to-mesohaline parts of the San Francisco bay estuary (Baxter et al. 2008).
In 1999, P. forbesi was discovered in the Columbia River estuary, Oregon/Washington and by 2002 ranged from Portland to near the mouth of the river at Astoria, and had largely replaced a previous invader P. inopinus (Sytsma et al. 2004; Cordell et al. 2008b). By 2009, it had also colonized the four lowest reservoirs on the Columbia River and lower Snake Rivers, more than 240 km from the head of tide at Bonneville Dam (Cordell 2012). In continuous sampling from a pier in Vancouver, Washington, it regularly occurred as a summer-fall dominant from 2005 through 2013, and comprised 23% of mean zooplankton individuals over that time (Dexter et al. 2015).
Pseudodiaptomus forbesi is not known from other estuaries, but it was abundant in the ballast tanks of ships coming to Puget Sound from other West Coast ports, presumably from the Columbia River or the inner San Francisco estuary (Cordell et al. 2008a).
Description
In adult Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, regardless of sex, the head carapace is fused with the 1st thoracic segment (Orsi and Walter 1991). In adult females, thoracic segment 4-5 are fused, and segment 5 bears 2 small posterodorsal spines, a rounded lateral protrusion, and a cluster of ventero-lateral spinules. The antennule (1st antenna) has 21 segments, and segment 3 has a posterior row of spinules. The urosome has 4 segments. Segment 1 has prominent fine spinules dorsally, while segments 1-3 have scales on the posterior edge. The caudal rami are symmetrical, with 5 terminal plumose setae each. The lateral setae are shortest, while the 3 central setae are divided into 3 sections. The egg sacs are paired. The 5th pair of swimming legs (P5) is symmetrical. The 2nd segments of the P5s have single large dorsal spinules and 3 rows of medial spinules. The 1st segments of the endopods have 2 small dorsal spinules and 3 strong medial spinules. The distomedial corner has a large, variably shaped hyaline membrane and strongly serrate outer spines. The terminal segment of P5 has two large serrated, terminal spines. The body length ranges from 1.10 to 1.18 mm. Description based on Orsi and Walter 1991.
In adult males, the 5th thoracic segment lacks dorsal spines. The spermatophores are small and slender. The first segment of urosome 1 has two dorsal clusters of spinules. The left antennule has 21 segments, while the right antennule has 19, with posterior spinules on segment 3. Segments 13-16 are widened, and the antennule is hinged at segment 17. The 2nd urosome segment has a ventral row of spinules. The caudal rami are symmetrical, with the setae as in the female. On the right P5, the 1st basipodite segment has 2 rows of spinules and the medial margin is produced into a triangular process. The 2nd basipodite segment has a large surface spinule and a dorsolateral row of spinules. The 1st and 2nd endopod segments have large external spines. The 3rd segment is elongate, with two medial knobs and serrated edges. The left P5 has a 1st basipodite segment similar to the right leg, but without the triangular process. The 2nd segment has the medial margin produced into a very long two-pronged process, and the margin is serrated between the two points. The longer point extends beyond the 1st segment of the endopod. The 2nd endopod has a serrated external spine, and the distolateral edge deeply cut by a V-shaped notch. The body length ranges from 0.97 to 1.04 mm. Description based on Orsi and Walter 1991.
The copepodite and naupliar stages of this copepod have not been described. Their morphology is probably similar to that of P. marinus (Uye and Onbe 1975). This copepod is characteristic of brackish and fresh waters.
Taxonomy
Taxonomic Tree
Kingdom: | Animalia | |
Phylum: | Arthropoda | |
Subphylum: | Crustacea | |
Class: | Maxillopoda | |
Subclass: | Copepoda | |
Order: | Calanoida | |
Family: | Pseudodiaptomidae | |
Genus: | Pseudodiaptomus | |
Species: | forbesi |
Synonyms
Schmackeria forbesi (Poppe and Richard, 1890)
Potentially Misidentified Species
Native from San Francisco Bay to Mexico.
Pseudodiaptomus inopinus
Introduced from Coos Bay to Columbia River, Oregon.
Pseudodiaptomus marinus
Introduced from Mexico to Tomales Bay, California.
Pseudodiaptomus pelagicus
East Coast of North America
Ecology
General:
Planktonic calanoid copepods mate in the water column. Males use their modified antenules and 5th pair of swimming legs to grasp the female and transfer spermatophores to the female's genital segment. Female Pseudodiaptomus forbesi carry eggs in two symmetrical clusters under the abdomen (Uye and Onbe 1975; Barnes 1983; Orsi and Walter 1991). Eggs hatch into nauplii which go through six stages. The first stage, NI, has 3 pairs of appendages and is unsegmented - each molt has additional appendages and/or more differentiation of segments. The sixth stage (NVI) molts into a first copepodite stage (CI), with the basic form of the adult and fully differentiated feeding structures, but with only two pairs of swimming legs and only one urosomal segment. The copepod goes through five additional molts, with increasing numbers of swimming legs, urosomal segments, and sexual differentiation. The sixth (CVI) stage is the male or female adult (Uye and Onbe 1975; Barnes 1983).
Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, like many other copepods of its genus, is characteristic of estuaries with low-salinity waters (Walter 1989; Orsi and Walter 1991). It is capable of completing its life cycle in freshwater, and inhabits tidal fresh waters, and has colonized four reservoirs of the Columbia River (Cordell et al. 2008). Late copepodites and adults of the genus Pseudodiaptomus have strong epibenthic tendencies, particularly by day and when carrying eggs. Adults may cling to hard surfaces using adhesive hairs on their antennules and filter in place (Fofonoff, personal observation of P. pelagicus, Narragansett Bay). All life stages feed on phytoplankton, although adults may also capture ciliates, rotifers, and copepod nauplii (Barnes 1983). In experiments, adult P. forbesi reduced the abundance of tintinnids and aloricate cilates, but had no net effect on phytoplankton biomass (York et al. 2014). In the Columbia River, P. forbesi showed a preference for diatoms and ciliates, but an avoidance of chlorophytes and cyanobacteria (Bowen et al. 2015). In brackish portions of the San Francisco estuary, abundance is correlated with high spring freshwater flow, due largely to physical transport of the copepods from freshwater. Modeling inidicates that high spring freshwater flows havor copepod populations, but fall flows amy decrease populations (Kimmerer et al. 2018; Hamilton et al. 2021).
Food:
Phytoplankton, detritus, tintinnids, ciliates
Consumers:
Fishes, Delta Smelt
Competitors:
Pseudodiaptomus inopinus
Trophic Status:
Suspension Feeder
SusFedHabitats
General Habitat | Tidal Fresh Marsh | None |
General Habitat | Unstructured Bottom | None |
General Habitat | Marinas & Docks | None |
Salinity Range | Limnetic | 0-0.5 PSU |
Salinity Range | Oligohaline | 0.5-5 PSU |
Salinity Range | Mesohaline | 5-18 PSU |
Tidal Range | Subtidal | None |
Vertical Habitat | Epibenthic | None |
Vertical Habitat | Planktonic | None |
Tolerances and Life History Parameters
Minimum Temperature (ºC) | 3 | Field, Columbia River estuary (Bollens et al. 2012) |
Maximum Temperature (ºC) | 27 | Maximum in San Joaquin river, near Stockton (Orsi and Mecum 1986) |
Minimum Salinity (‰) | 0 | Field, San Francisco Bay (Orsi and Walter 1991) |
Maximum Salinity (‰) | 16 | Field, San Francisco Bay (Orsi and Walter 1991). In experiments, nauplii of P. forbesi tolerated salinities at least as high as 14 PSU, and adults, at least 8 PSU. but it has become rare at salinities above 2 PSU, probably because of predation by A. sinensis and by Corbula amurensis. |
Minimum Length (mm) | 1 | Minimum adult length, male (Orsi and Walter 1991) |
Maximum Length (mm) | 1.2 | Maximum adult length, female (Orsi and Walter 1991) |
Broad Temperature Range | None | Warm temperate |
Broad Salinity Range | None | Nontidal Limnetic-Mesohaline |
General Impacts
Ecological ImpactsCompetition: After its invasion in 1987, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi has remained the dominant calanoid copepod in low-salinity regions of the San Francisco estuary, while Eurytemora carolleeae (formerly E. affinis) has declined (Orsi and Walter 1991; Baxter et al. 2005), suggestive of competition between the two species. In the Columbia River, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, by 2002, had replaced a previous invader, P. inopinus (Systsma 2004; Cordell 2008a; Dexter et al. 2015). Competition with the native form of 'Eurytemora affinis' is possible, since the two species have a substantial temporal overlap (Bollens et al. 2012).
Food/Prey: Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was selected against by larval Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), apparently because of superior escape abilities (Meng and Orsi 1991). However, Pseudodiaptomus spp., mostly P. forbesi, have become the predominant food of small (under 50 mm) Striped Bass (Bryant and Arnold 2007). Pseudodiaptomus forbesi is also now the principal food organism of the endangered Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) and the threatened Longfin Smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Hobbs et al. 2006). It is considered to be inferior to the previous dominant copepod, Eurytemora affinis, as a food item for the smelts (Moyle et al. 1992; Nobriga 2002).
Regional Impacts
NEP-V | Northern California to Mid Channel Islands | Ecological Impact | Food/Prey | ||
Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was selected against by larval Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), apparently because of superior escape abilities (Meng and Orsi 1991). However, Pseudodiaptomus spp., mostly P. forbesi, have become the predominant food of small (under 50 mm) Striped Bass (Bryant and Arnold 2007). Pseudodiaptomus forbesi is also now the principal food organism of the endangered Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus and the threatened Longfin Smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Hobbs et al. 2006). It is considered to be inferior to the previous dominant copepod, Eurytemora carolleeae as a food item for the smelts (Moyle et al. 1992; Nobriga 2002). The shift in dominance from Eurytemora to Pseudodiaptomus was associated with a decrease in average length for Delta Smelt (Glibert 2010). Overall, changes in the fatty-acid and overall nutritional quality in the foodweb are complex, but the shift from more herbivorous native cladocerans to more omnivorous copepods may have increased transfer of contaminants up the food-chain, and increased dominance of cyanobacteria (Kratina and Winder 2015). The effects of introduced copepods are additionally complex, because of the varying size of the life-stages, and the interaction of different species of fish predators (Sullivan et al. 2016). | |||||
P090 | San Francisco Bay | Ecological Impact | Food/Prey | ||
Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was selected against by larval Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), apparently because of superior escape abilities (Meng and Orsi 1991). However, Pseudodiaptomus spp., mostly P. forbesi, have become the predominant food of small (under 50 mm) Striped Bass (Bryant and Arnold 2007). Pseudodiaptomus forbesi is also now the principal food organism of the endangered Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus and the threatened Longfin Smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Hobbs et al. 2006; Slater and Baxter 2014; Kimmerer et al. 2018; Hamilton et al. 2020). It is considered to be inferior to the previous dominant copepod, Eurytemora affinis as a food item for the smelts (Moyle 1992; Nobriga 2002). Overall, changes in the fatty-acid and overall nutritional quality in the foodweb are complex, but the shift from more herbivorous native cladocerans to more omnivorous copepods may have increased transfer of contaminants up the food-chain, and increased dominance of cyanobacteria (Kratina and Winder 2015). The effects of introduced copepods are additionally complex, because of the varying size of the life-stages, and the interaction of different species of fish predators (Sullivan et al. 2016). | |||||
P090 | San Francisco Bay | Ecological Impact | Competition | ||
After its invasion in 1987, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi has remained the dominant calnaoid copepod in low-salinity regions of the San Francisco estuary, while Eurytemora carolleeae has declined (Orsi and Walter 1991; Baxter et al. 2005). One of many possible factors is that Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was better able to graze selectively than E. caroleeae, thus avoiding the toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis sp., which has been blooming in low-salinity waters of the estuary (Ger et al. 2010) . | |||||
NEP-V | Northern California to Mid Channel Islands | Ecological Impact | Competition | ||
After its invasion in 1987, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi has remained the dominant calanoid copepod in low-salinity regions of the San Francisco estuary, while Eurytemora carolleeae (formerly E. affinis) has declined (Orsi and Walter 1991; Baxter et al. 2005). One of many possible factors is that Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was better able to graze selectively than E. caroleeae, thus avoiding the toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis sp., which has been blooming in low-salinity waters of the estuary (Ger et al. 2010). | |||||
NEP-IV | Puget Sound to Northern California | Ecological Impact | Competition | ||
In the Columbia River, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, by 2002, has largely replaced a previous invader, P. inopinus (Sytsma et al. 2004; Cordell 2008). Psudodiaptomus forbesi has a substantial period of temporal overlap and potential competition with the native northeast Pacific form of 'Eurytemora affinis' in the Columbia estuary (Bollens et al. 2012). | |||||
NEP-IV | Puget Sound to Northern California | Ecological Impact | Food/Prey | ||
In experiments, 3 species of native fishes (Chinook Salmon- Oncorhynchus tschawytscha, Three-spined Stickleback- Gasterosteus aculeatus, and Northern Pikeminnow- Ptychocheilus oregonensis) consumed P. forbesi together with native copepods, but salmon and pikemnnows showed a preference for native cladocerans over copepods (Adams et al. 2015). | |||||
CA | California | Ecological Impact | Competition | ||
After its invasion in 1987, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi has remained the dominant calanoid copepod in low-salinity regions of the San Francisco estuary, while Eurytemora carolleeae (formerly E. affinis) has declined (Orsi and Walter 1991; Baxter et al. 2005). One of many possible factors is that Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was better able to graze selectively than E. caroleeae, thus avoiding the toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis sp., which has been blooming in low-salinity waters of the estuary (Ger et al. 2010)., After its invasion in 1987, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi has remained the dominant calnaoid copepod in low-salinity regions of the San Francisco estuary, while Eurytemora carolleeae has declined (Orsi and Walter 1991; Baxter et al. 2005). One of many possible factors is that Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was better able to graze selectively than E. caroleeae, thus avoiding the toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis sp., which has been blooming in low-salinity waters of the estuary (Ger et al. 2010) . | |||||
CA | California | Ecological Impact | Food/Prey | ||
Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was selected against by larval Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), apparently because of superior escape abilities (Meng and Orsi 1991). However, Pseudodiaptomus spp., mostly P. forbesi, have become the predominant food of small (under 50 mm) Striped Bass (Bryant and Arnold 2007). Pseudodiaptomus forbesi is also now the principal food organism of the endangered Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus and the threatened Longfin Smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Hobbs et al. 2006). It is considered to be inferior to the previous dominant copepod, Eurytemora carolleeae as a food item for the smelts (Moyle et al. 1992; Nobriga 2002). The shift in dominance from Eurytemora to Pseudodiaptomus was associated with a decrease in average length for Delta Smelt (Glibert 2010). Overall, changes in the fatty-acid and overall nutritional quality in the foodweb are complex, but the shift from more herbivorous native cladocerans to more omnivorous copepods may have increased transfer of contaminants up the food-chain, and increased dominance of cyanobacteria (Kratina and Winder 2015). The effects of introduced copepods are additionally complex, because of the varying size of the life-stages, and the interaction of different species of fish predators (Sullivan et al. 2016)., Pseudodiaptomus forbesi was selected against by larval Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), apparently because of superior escape abilities (Meng and Orsi 1991). However, Pseudodiaptomus spp., mostly P. forbesi, have become the predominant food of small (under 50 mm) Striped Bass (Bryant and Arnold 2007). Pseudodiaptomus forbesi is also now the principal food organism of the endangered Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus and the threatened Longfin Smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Hobbs et al. 2006; Slater and Baxter 2014; Kimmerer et al. 2018; Hamilton et al. 2020). It is considered to be inferior to the previous dominant copepod, Eurytemora affinis as a food item for the smelts (Moyle 1992; Nobriga 2002). Overall, changes in the fatty-acid and overall nutritional quality in the foodweb are complex, but the shift from more herbivorous native cladocerans to more omnivorous copepods may have increased transfer of contaminants up the food-chain, and increased dominance of cyanobacteria (Kratina and Winder 2015). The effects of introduced copepods are additionally complex, because of the varying size of the life-stages, and the interaction of different species of fish predators (Sullivan et al. 2016). |
Occurrence Map
OCC_ID | Author | Year | Date | Locality | Status | Latitude | Longitude |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
697382 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1989 | San Joaquin River at Buckley Cove (IEP Zooplankton Station 92) | Non-native | 37.9783 | -121.3819 | |
697383 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1988 | Delta General Location | Non-native | 38.0500 | -121.8100 | |
697385 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1987 | San Joaquin River at Buckley Cove (IEP Zooplankton Station 92) | Non-native | 37.9783 | -121.3819 | |
697391 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1988 | San Joaquin River at Buckley Cove (IEP Zooplankton Station 92) | Non-native | 37.9783 | -121.3819 | |
698189 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1989 | Suisun Bay | Non-native | 38.0713 | -122.0581 | |
698190 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1988 | Suisun Bay | Non-native | 38.0713 | -122.0581 | |
701592 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1989 | Delta General Location | Non-native | 38.0500 | -121.8100 | |
701593 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1988 | Delta General Location | Non-native | 38.0500 | -121.8100 | |
701620 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1987 | Old River, near Rancho del Oro (IEP Zooplankton Station D28) | Non-native | 37.9826 | -121.5813 | |
702928 | Introduced Species Study | 2006 | 2006-06-12 | Port of Oakland Plankton 04 | Non-native | 37.7491 | -122.2238 |
703609 | Introduced Species Study | 2006 | 2006-06-12 | Port of Oakland Plankton 02 | Non-native | 37.7920 | -122.2758 |
758001 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1987 | San Joaquin River near Medford Island (IEP Historic Zooplankton Station 88) | Non-native | 38.0541 | -121.5158 | |
758002 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1987 | San Joaquin River at Potato Point (IEP Zooplankton Station 86) | Non-native | 38.0778 | -121.5703 | |
758003 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1987 | San Joaquin River below confluence with Mokelumne River (IEP Historic Zooplankton Station 84) | Non-native | 38.1017 | -121.6050 | |
758004 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1987 | Sacramento River, NE end of Decker Island (IEP Historic Zooplankton Station 66) | Non-native | 38.1086 | -121.7144 | |
758005 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1988 | Old River, near Rancho del Oro (IEP Zooplankton Station D28) | Non-native | 37.9826 | -121.5813 | |
758006 | Orsi and Walter 1991 | 1988 | Sacramento River, NE end of Decker Island (IEP Historic Zooplankton Station 66) | Non-native | 38.1086 | -121.7144 | |
758007 | Orsi 2000b | 2000 | Delta General Location | Non-native | 38.0500 | -121.8100 | |
758008 | Bouley and Kimmerer 2006 | 2003 | Martinez Pier | Non-native | 38.0316 | -122.1313 | |
758009 | Bouley and Kimmerer 2006 | 2003 | Port Chicago | Non-native | 38.0589 | -122.0246 | |
758010 | Bouley and Kimmerer 2006 | 2003 | Antioch Pier | Non-native | 38.0210 | -121.7507 |
References
Adams, Jesse B.; Bollens, Stephen M.; Bishop, John G. (2015) Predation on the invasive copepod, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, and native zooplankton in the lower Columbia River: an experimental approach to quantify differences in prey-specific feeding rates, PLOS ONE 10(11): e0144095Alves, Mickael Teixeira; Tidbury, Hannah J. (2022) Invasive non-native species management under climatic and anthropogenic pressure: application of a modelling framework, Management of Biological Invasions 13(13): In press
Baxter, Randall, and 11 Authors (2008) <missing title>, Inter-Agency Ecological Program, Sacramento. Pp. 1-52
Bollens, Stephen M.; Breckenridge, Joanne K.; Cordell, Jeffery R. Simenstad, Charles A.; Kalata, Olga (2014) Zooplankton of tidal marsh channels in relation to environmental variables in the upper San Francisco Estuary, Aquatic Biology 21: 205-219
Bollens, Stephen M.; Breckenridge, Joanne K. Vanden Hoof, Rian C.; Cordell, Jeffery R. (2011) Mesozooplankton of the lower San Francisco Estuary: spatio-temporal patterns, ENSO effects and the prevalence of non-indigenous species, Journal of Plankton Research 33(9): 1358-1377
Bollens, Stephen M.; Breckenridge, Joanne K.; Cordell, Jeffery R.; Rollwagen-Bollens; Gretchen; Kalata, Olga (2012) Invasive copepods in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: Seasonal abundance, co-occurrence and potential competition with native copepods, Aquatic Invasions 7(1): 101-109
Bowen, Alyssa; Rollwagen-Bollens, Gretchen; Bollens, Stephen M.; Zimmerman, Julie (2015) Feeding of the invasive copepod Pseudodiaptomus forbesi on natural microplankton assemblages within the lower Columbia River, Journal of Plankton Research 37(6): 1089-1094
Breckenridge, J. K.; Bollens, S. M.; Rollwagen-Bollens, G.; Roegner, G. C. (2015) Plankton assemblage variability in a river-dominated temperate estuary during late spring (high-flow) and late summer (low-flow) periods, Estuaries and Coasts 38: 93-103
Chen, Po-Cheng; Shih, Chun-Han Ta-Jen Chu; Wang, Dary; Lee, Ying-Chou'; Tzeng, TzongDer (2015) Population Structure and Historical Demography of the Oriental River Prawn (Macrobrachium nipponense) in Taiwan, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 10(12): e0145927
Cohen, Andrew N.; Carlton, James T. (1995) Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Sea Grant College Program (Connecticut Sea Grant), Washington DC, Silver Spring MD.. Pp. <missing location>
Cordell, Jeffrey (2012) A handbook of global freshwater invasive species, Eatrhscan, New York NY. Pp. 161-172
Cordell, Jeffrey R. and 5 authors (2009) Factors influencing densities of non-indigenous species in the ballast water of ships arriving at ports in Puget Sound, Washington, United States, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19(3): 322-343
Cordell, Jeffrey; Bollens, Stephen M.; Draheim, Robyn; Sytsma, Mark (2008) Asian copepods on the move: Recent invasions in the Columbia-Snake River system, USA, ICES Journal of Marine Science 65: 753-758
Dexter, Eric; Bollens, Stephen M.; Rollwagen-Bollens, Gretchen; Emerson, Josh; Zimmerman, Julie (2015) Persistent vs. ephemeral invasions: 8.5 years of zooplankton community dynamics in the Columbia River, Limnology and Oceanography 60: 527-539
Emerson, Joshua E.; Bollens, Stephen M.; Counihan, Timothy D. (2014) Seasonal dynamics of zooplankton in Columbia-Snake River reservoirs, with special emphasis on the invasive copepod Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, Aquatic Invasions 10: 25-40
Fairey, Russell; Dunn, Roslyn; Sigala, Marco; Oliver, John (2002) Introduced aquatic species in California's coastal waters: Final Report, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Pp. <missing location>
Gauff, Robin (2023) Unexpected biotic homogenization masks the effect of a pollution gradient on local variability of community structure in a marine urban environment, Journa of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 562(151882): Published online
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2023.151882
Ger, Kemal Ali; Arneson, Patricia; Goldman, Charles Remington; Joo Teh, Swee (2010) Species specific differences in the ingestion of Microcystis cells by the calanoid copepods Eurytemora affinis and Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, Journal of Plankton Research 32(10): 1479-1484
Glibert, Patricia M. (2010) Long-term changes in nutrient loading and stoichiometry and their relationships with changes in the food web and dominant pelagic fish species in the San Francisco estuary, California, Reviews in Fisheries Science 18: 211-232
Hamilton, Scott; Bartell, Steve; Pierson, James; Murphy, Dennis (2021) Factors controlling calanoid copepod biomass and distribution in the Upper San Francisco Estuary and Implications for Managing the imperiled Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus), Environmental Management 65: 587-601
Hobbs, J. A.; Bennett, W. A.; Burton, J. E. (2006) Assessing nursery habitat quality for native smelts (Osmeridae) in the low-salinity zone of the San Francisco estuary, Journal of Fish Biology 69: 907-922
Huang, Zongguo (Ed.), Junda Lin (Translator) (2001) Marine Species and Their Distributions in China's Seas, Krieger, Malabar, FL. Pp. <missing location>
Kimmerer, William J.; Burau, J. R.; Bennett, W. A. (1998) Tidally oriented vertical migration and position maintenance of zooplankton in a temperate estuary., Limnology and Oceanography 43(7): 1697-1709
Kimmerer, William; Gartside, Ellen; Orsi, James J. (1994) Predation by an introduced clam as the likely cause of substantial declines in zooplankton of San Francisco Bay., Marine Ecology Progress Series 113: 81-93
Kratina, Pavel; Winder, Monika (2015) Biotic invasions can alter nutritional composition of zooplankton communities, Oikos 124: 1337-1345
Liu, Wenliang; Liang, Xiaoli ; Zhu, Xiaojing (2015) A new record and mitochondrial identification of Synidotea laticauda Benedict, 1897 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Valvifera: Idoteidae) from the Yangtze Estuary, China, Zootaxa 4294: 371-380
Meng, Lesa; Orsi, James J. (1991) Selective predation by larval striped bass on native and introduced copepods., Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120: 187-192
Mizrahi, Damián; Silva, Milena C.; Fonseca, Maurício L.; Lopes, Rubens M. (2023) Resistance to desiccation and healing regeneration in the sun coral, Bioinvasions Records 14: In press
Moyle, Peter B.; Herbold, Bruce; Stevens, Donald E.; Miller, Lee W. (1992) Life history and status of the delta smelt in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, California, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121: 67-77
Nobriga, Matthew L. (2002) Larval delta smelt diet composition and feeding incidence: Environmental and ontogenetic influences, California Fish and Game 88(4): 149-164
Orsi, James J., Walter, T. Chad (1991) Pseudodiaptomus forbesi and P. marinus (Copepoda: Calanoida), the latest copepod immigrants to California's Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan <missing volume>: 553-562
Orsi, James J.; Mecum, Walter L. (1986) Zooplankton distribution and abundance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta in relation to certain environmental factors, Estuaries 9(4B): 326-339
Soors, Jan; Faasse, Marco; Stevens, Maarten; Verbessem, Ingrid; De Regge, Nico;Van den Bergh, Ericia (2010) New crustacean invaders in the Schelde estuary (Belgium), Belgian Journal of Zoology 140: 3-10
Sytsma, Mark D.; Cordell, Jeffrey R.; Chapman, John W.; Draheim, Robyn, C. (2004) <missing title>, Center for Lakes and Reservoirs, Portland State University, Portland OR. Pp. <missing location>
Sytsma, Mark; Cordell, Jeff; Chapman, John; Miller, Rich; Draheim, Robyn; (2004) Lower Columbia River aquatic nonindigenous species survey 2001-2004: Final technical report, Portland State University, Portland. Pp. <missing location>
Uye, Shin-ichi; Onbe, Takashi (1975) The developmental stages of Pseudodiaptomus marinus reared in the laboratory, Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan 21(2): 1-12
Winder, Monika; Jassby, Alan D. (2011) Shifts in zooplankton community structure: implications for food web processes in the upper San Francisco estuary, Estuaries and Coasts 34: 675-690
Winder; Monika; Jassby, Alan D.; Mac Nally, Ralph (2011) Synergies between climate anomalies and hydrological modifications facilitate estuarine biotic invasions, Ecology Letters 14: 749-757
York, Joanna K.; McManus, George B.; Kimmerer, Wim J.; Slaughter, Anne M.; Ignoffo, Toni R. (2014) Trophic links in the plankton in the low salinity zone of a large temperate estuary: Top-down effects of introduced copepods, Estuaries and Coasts 37: 576-588