Description
Amorpha fruticosa is a woody shrub belonging to the bean family (Fabaceae, formerly Leguminosae). Other Taxonomic Groupings- There is one named cultivar (a named, patented cultivated variety), called 'Dark Lance' (Simpson et al. 1989).
Taxonomy
Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plantae | Magnoliophyta | Magnoliopsida | Fabales | Fabaceae | Amorpha |
Synonyms
Invasion History
Chesapeake Bay Status
First Record | Population | Range | Introduction | Residency | Source Region | Native Region | Vectors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1898 | Established | Expanding | Introduced | Regular Resident | North America | North America | Ornamental(Garden Escape),Shipping(Dry Ballast) |
History of Spread
Amorpha fruticosa (False Indigo) is native to FL and LA north to WV and PA, west to MI and KS (Gray 1848; Fernald 1950; Stuckey 1990), and in the northern part of the Appalachians to PA (Fernald 1950; Stuckey 1990). A. fruticosa is frequently planted in gardens as an ornamental, and is now widespread. It is generally sporadic inland, but common in coastal regions from VA to ME on the East Coast (Gleason and Cronquist 1991; Stuckey 1990). The earliest reported 'wild' record on the East Coast is from the Hackensack Meadows NJ (Britton 1889).
Amorpha fruticosa is not listed in nineteenth-century floras for the Washington-Baltimore area or in Shreve et al. (1910) for MD. The first report of its wild occurrence in the Chesapeake area was in Potomac Park, Washington DC, 1898 (Hitchcock and Standley 1919). It was considered an occasional garden escape in Washington (Hitchcock and Standley 1919) and MD (Brown and Brown 1972) and the Eastern Shore-DE region (Tatnall 1946).
Harvill et al.'s (1992) map shows occurrences in most VA counties along the Potomac estuary, in several other coastal counties, and in 7 scattered Piedmont and Mountain counties, supporting introduced status in the Coastal Plain and perhaps elsewhere in VA. It was listed by Wass (1972) as occurring on Aquia Creek, a VA Potomac Tributary, and Sipple (1978) reported populations along upper Chesapeake Bay and the Potomac. Krauss et al. (1971) noted occurrences on 'beach trashlines', Kent County MD. A. fruticosa was abundant at North Point State Park, Edgmere MD, north of Baltimore Harbor, and common along mesohaline marshes and beaches at Eastern Neck National Wildlife Refuge , Kent County MD , and at Sandy Point State Park, north of Annapolis ( Fofonoff personal observations 1995-97). Higman (1968) found it to be 'infrequent' on sandy beaches at Ivy Neck, Rhode River, Edgewater MD. In 2003, it was abundant along the shores of Ivy Neck (Fofonoff, personal observations). On the Potomac River it was abundant in Dyke Marsh, Alexandria VA (Fofonoff, personal observations 1996), in oligohaline Brent Marsh, Stafford County VA, Potomac River, (Strong and Kelloff 1994), and common on beach margins at Caledon Natural Area, King George County VA (Simmons et al. 1995).
Amorpha fruticosa has invaded river banks in the Columbia-Snake River system in WA-OR, and is expected to spread throughout the lower elevations of that system (Glad and Halse 1993). It has also been introduced to Greece, China and Africa. (References in Biological Abstracts 1992-1996). This plant has been reported from all the continental United States except MT and NV (Natural Resources Conservation Service 1998).
History References - Britton 1889; Brown and Brown 1972; Glad and Halse 1993; Fernald 1950; Gleason and Cronquist 1991; Gray 1848;Harvill et al. 1992; Higman 1968; Hitchcock and Standley 1919; Robinson and Fernald 1908; Shreve et al. 1910; Simmons et al. 1995; Sipple 1978; Strong and Kelloff 1994; Stuckey 1990; Natural Resources Conservation Service 1998; Wass 1972
Invasion Comments
Ecology
Environmental Tolerances
For Survival | For Reproduction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum | Maximum | Minimum | Maximum | |
Temperature (ºC) | ||||
Salinity (‰) | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
Oxygen | ||||
pH | ||||
Salinity Range | fresh-meso |
Age and Growth
Male | Female | |
---|---|---|
Minimum Adult Size (mm) | 1000.0 | 1000.0 |
Typical Adult Size (mm) | 2000.0 | 2000.0 |
Maximum Adult Size (mm) | 5000.0 | 5000.0 |
Maximum Longevity (yrs) | ||
Typical Longevity (yrs |
Reproduction
Start | Peak | End | |
---|---|---|---|
Reproductive Season | |||
Typical Number of Young Per Reproductive Event |
|||
Sexuality Mode(s) | |||
Mode(s) of Asexual Reproduction |
|||
Fertilization Type(s) | |||
More than One Reproduction Event per Year |
|||
Reproductive Startegy | |||
Egg/Seed Form |
Impacts
Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay
Amorpha fruticosa (Wild False-Indigo) probably has few or no economic impacts in Chesapeake Bay. It is an attractive ornamental (Simpson et al. 1989).
Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay
The spread of Amorpha fruticosa (Wild False-Indigo) on the Snake and Columbia Rivers is described by Glad and Halse (1993) without mention of adverse impacts. It was originally introduced to that region to provide wildlife food and cover. It is included on invasive plant lists for WA and CT (Washington Department of Ecology 1998; Mehroff 1999). A. fruticosa is attractive to insect pollinators (Stuckey 1990). In some parts of the world where it has spread (China, Russia, Greece), it seems to be regarded as a useful invader as goat fodder (Greece), or for reclaiming waste dumps (China). It is also being investigated for anticancer compounds (References in Biological Abstracts 1993-96).
References- Glad and Halse 1993; Mehroff 1999; Stuckey 1990; Washington Department of Ecology 1998;
Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species
Amorpha fruticosa (Wild False-Indigo) is now common to abundant on fresh to mesohaline beaches and marshes (Simmons et al. 1995; Strong and Kelloff 1994), and is a possible source of wildlife cover and food, and a possible competitor with other high intertidal shrubs, especially Iva frutescens and Baccharis halimifolia. In some upper Bay locations, such as the barrier beach at North Point State Park, Edgemere MD, it outnumbers the native shoreline shrubs. However, impacts of the plant in Chesapeake Bay, and also in newly invaded areas along the Columbia River (Glad and Halse 1993) are not documented.
Amorpha fruticosa is included on invasive plant lists for WA and CT (Washington Department of Ecology 1998; Mehroff 1999). A. fruticosa is attractive to insect pollinators (Stuckey 1990). However, no information is available on its ecological impacts in Chesapeake Bay. Since this shrub is native to North America, and to regions just south and west of the Bay watershed, the extent and impacts of its invasion have been largely overlooked.
References - Glad and Halse 1993; Mehroff 1999; Simmons et al. 1995; Strong and Kelloff 1994; Stuckey 1990; Washington Department of Ecology 1998
Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species
Amorpha fruticosa (Wild False-Indigo) is a common shrub on fresh-mesohaline marshes and beaches. Competition with introduced shore flora is possible but not documented.
References
Britton, Nathaniel L. (1889) Catalogue of higher plants of New Jersey., , Trenton NJ. Pp.Brown, M. L.; Brown, R. G. (1972) Woody plants of Maryland., , College Park. Pp.
Brown, Melvin L.; Brown, Russell G. (1984) Herbaceous Plants of Maryland, , College Park. Pp.
Fernald, Merritt L. (1950) Gray's Manual of Botany, In: (Eds.) . , New York. Pp.
Glad, Judith B.; Halse, Richard R. (1993) Invasion of Amorpha fruticosa L.(Leguminosae) along the Columbia and Snake Rivers in Oregon and Washington., Madroño 40: 62-63
Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur (1991) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, In: (Eds.) . , Bronx, New York. Pp.
Godfrey, R. K.; Wooten, Jean W. (1981) Aquatic and Wetland Plants of the Southeastern United States: Dicotyledones, , Athens. Pp.
Gray, Asa (1848) A manual of botany of the northern United States., In: (Eds.) . , Boston. Pp.
Harvill, A. M.; Bradley, Ted R.; Stevens, Charles E.; Wieboldt, Thomas F.; Ware, Donna M. E.; Ogle, Douglas W.; Ramsey, Gwynn W.; Fleming, Gary P. (1992) Atlas of the Virginia Flora, , Burkeville, VA. Pp.
Higman, Daniel (1968) An ecologically annotated checklst of the vascular flora at the Chesapeake Bay Center for Field Biology., In: (Eds.) . , Washington, D.C.. Pp.
Hitchcock, A. S.; Standley, P. C. (1919) Flora of the District of Columbia and Vicinity., In: (Eds.) . , Washington, D. C.. Pp.
Kartesz, John T. (1994) A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland., In: (Eds.) . , Portland OR. Pp.
Krauss, R.W.; Brown, R. G.; Rappleye, R. D.; Owens, A. B.; Shearer, C.; Hsiao, E.; Reveal, J. (1971) Checklist of plant species occurring within the hightide limits of the Chesapeake Bay, and its tributaries., , College Park, Maryland. Pp.
1999 List of non-native invasive vascular plants in Connecticut.. http://www.eeb.uconn.edu/collections/herbarium/herbariumother/ilist99.html
1997-2024 USDA PLANTS Database.. Onine databse
Resource Management Inc. (1993) National list of plant species that occur in wetlands., , Minneapolis.. Pp.
Robinson, Benjamin Lincoln; Fernald, Merrit L. (1908) Gray's New Manual of Botany., , New York. Pp.
Shreve, Forrest M.; Chrysler, M. A.; Blodgett, Frederck H.; Besley, F. W. (1910) The Plant Life of Maryland, , Baltmore. Pp.
Simmons, Mark P.; Ware, Donna M.; Hayden, W. John (1995) The vascular flora of the Potomac River watershed of King George County, Virginia, Castanea 60: 179-209
Simpson, Benny J.; Hipp, Billy W.; McWilliams, Edward L. (1989) 'Dark Lance' False Indigo, HortScience 24: 713-714
Sipple, William S. (1978) An atlas of vascular plant distribution species for tidewater Maryland, , Annapolis, Maryland. Pp.
1995 Introduced plants in the Chesapeake Bay region, conversation with Paul Fofonoff.
Strong, Mark T.; Kelloff, Carol L. (1994) Intertidal vascular plants of Brent Marsh, Potomac River, Stafford County, Virginia, Castanea 59: 354-366
Stuckey, Irene H. (1990) Plants beside the Sea 48. False Indigo, Maritimes 33: 15-16
Tatnall, Robert R. (1946) Flora of Delaware and the Eastern Shore, , Wilmington. Pp.
2024 Fanwort (Cabomba caroliniana).
Wass, Melvin L. (1972) A checklist of the biota of lower Chesapeake Bay, Special Scientific Report, Virginia Institute of Marine Science 65: 1-290