Description
Medusae of Clytia paulensis are known (Calder 1972; Cornelius 1982), but have not been described, to our knowledge.
Synonymy - Calder notes 'However, there is nothing in Fraser's (1914) description of Clytia longitheca to distinguish it from C. paulensis, and the two species may be synonymous. Verification of this must await a critical examination of Fraser's specimens. C. longitheca is known from British Columbia to San Francisco Bay (Fraser 1937a)' (Calder 1971).
Potentially Misidentified Species - 'The whole genus is a difficult one and in need of revision' (Calder 1997).
Taxonomy
Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animalia | Cnidaria | Hydozoa | Leptomedusae | Campanulariidae | Clytia |
Synonyms
Invasion History
Chesapeake Bay Status
First Record | Population | Range | Introduction | Residency | Source Region | Native Region | Vectors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1968 | Established | Unknown | Cryptogenic | Regular Resident | Eastern Atlantic | Unknown-Marine | Shipping(Ballast Water,Fouling Community) |
History of Spread
The hydrozoan Clytia paulensis was described from the crater lagoon of St. Paul Island, Indian Ocean, from material collected in 1903. It was subsequently found to be widespread in warm ocean waters, including eastern South Africa (Millard 1975), the Red Sea (Mergner and Wedler 1977), Australia (Watson 1994), the Mediterranean (Cornelius 1982), and possibly the Northeast Pacific (British Columbia to San Francisco Bay, as C. longitheca) (Calder 1971). In the NE Atlantic, it ranges north to southernmost England (Cornelius 1982). The first published English record was in 1973, from Plymouth, but subsequently, museum material from 1899 was found (Cornelius 1982). Relatively recent records first records of this species from several locations [Red Sea (Mergner and Wedler 1977)], southern Australia (Watson 1994), Northwest Atlantic, VA-SC (Calder 1971; Calder 1976) could reflect the taxonomic difficulty of this genus as well as possible introductions (Calder 1997). Clytia paulensis has not been specifically reported from ship fouling, but it frequently grows on other hydroids, some of which are known as common ship fouling organisms (e.g. Obelia dichotoma, Millard 1959).
Clytia paulensis was not listed among hydroids of the Atlantic coast of North America by Fraser (1944). The first West Atlantic records of this species were from Chesapeake Bay from the lower York and James Rivers, and from the Bay mouth, on pilings of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel (Calder 1971). Subsequently, C. paulensis was found to be common in SC (Calder 1976; Calder and Hester 1978), and also in the Caribbean Sea (Calder 1997).
We consider Clytia paulensis to be cryptogenic in Chesapeake Bay and elsewhere on the North American Atlantic coast. 'It could have been around the Chesapeake for hundreds, if not thousands of years, although admittedly it is curious that Fraser (1944) did not report the species from the western North Atlantic (Calder 1997).
Calder found Clytia paulensis in tributaries of the lower Bay. Previous and subsequent fouling studies usually did not identify Campanularidae to species (Abbe 1987; Cory 1967; Humphries et al. 1985), so there are no further definite records of C. paulensis. Most samples of Clytia from our fouling plates lacked gonophores and could not be identified to species (Calder 1997; Ruiz et al. unpublished data).
History References - Abbe 1987; Calder 1971; Calder 1972; Calder 1976; Calder 1997; Calder and Hester 1978; Cornelius 1982; Cory 1967; Fraser 1944; Humphries et al. 1985; Mergner and Wedler 1977; Millard 1959; Millard 1975; Ruiz et al. unpublished data; Watson 1994
Invasion Comments
Vector(s) of Introduction - Ballast water transport of medusae may be possible. Clytia spp. and other campanulariids are known to attach to such fauna as sea turtles, whales, and fishes (Cornelius 1982), so that natural transport cannot be ruled out.
Invasion Status- We have called Clytia paulensis cryptogenic, because the taxonomic difficulty of the genus may have delayed the recognition of C. kincaidi in the northwest Atlantic, and because of the possibility of natural transport by fauna.
Ecology
Environmental Tolerances
For Survival | For Reproduction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum | Maximum | Minimum | Maximum | |
Temperature (ºC) | 9.0 | 26.0 | ||
Salinity (‰) | 17.0 | 40.0 | ||
Oxygen | ||||
pH | ||||
Salinity Range | meso-eu |
Age and Growth
Male | Female | |
---|---|---|
Minimum Adult Size (mm) | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Typical Adult Size (mm) | ||
Maximum Adult Size (mm) | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Maximum Longevity (yrs) | ||
Typical Longevity (yrs |
Reproduction
Start | Peak | End | |
---|---|---|---|
Reproductive Season | |||
Typical Number of Young Per Reproductive Event |
|||
Sexuality Mode(s) | |||
Mode(s) of Asexual Reproduction |
|||
Fertilization Type(s) | |||
More than One Reproduction Event per Year |
|||
Reproductive Startegy | |||
Egg/Seed Form |
Impacts
Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay
Clytia paulensis is sufficiently abundant that it could be a significant fouling organism in the Chesapeake region. However, it has not been reported specifically from ship or powerplant fouling, to our knowledge, though it grows epizoically on many significant fouling organisms (Calder 1971). Its overall contribution to fouling problems is probably small, but is not known
Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay
Clytia paulensis is quite cosmopolitan in warm waters. However, it has not been reported specifically from ship or powerplant fouling, to our knowledge. It does grow epizoically on many significant fouling organisms (Calder 1971; Cornelius 1982). Its overall contribution to fouling problems is probably small, but is not known
Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species
Clytia paulensis is sufficiently abundant that it could have significant impacts on native organisms. in Chesapeake Bay. However, it does not appear to differ greatly from native Clytia spp. in its biology or potential impacts. In any case, its impacts are unstudied in the Chesapeake region and elsewhere.
Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species
Impacts of Clytia paulensis on other introduced and cryptogenic fauna have not been studied.
References
Abbe, George R. (1987) Epifauna, In: Heck, Kenneth L.(Eds.) Ecological studies in the middle reach of Chesapeake Bay- Calvert Cliffs. , Berlin. Pp. 82-91Calder, Dale R. (1971) Hydroids and hydromedusae of southern Chesapeake Bay., Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Special Papers in Marine Science 1: 1-125
Calder, Dale R. (1972) Phylum Cnidaria, Special Scientific Report, Virginia Institute of Marine Science 65: 97-102
Calder, Dale R. (1976) The zonation of hydroids along salinity gradients in South Carolina estuaries, In: (Eds.) Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. , New York. Pp. 165-174
Calder, Dale R. (1992) Seasonal cycles of activity and inactivity in some hydroids from Virginia and South Carolina, U.S.A., Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 442-450
Calder, Dale R. (1997) Introduced hydroids in Chesapeake Bay, email, Zoologische Verhandlingen Leiden :
Calder, Dale R.; Hester, Betty S. (1978) Phylum Cnidaria., In: Zingmark, Richard G.(Eds.) An Annotated Checklist of the Biota of the Coastal Zone of South Carolina. , Columbia. Pp. 87-93
Cornelius, P. F. S, (1982) Hydroids and medusae of the family Campanulariidae recorded from the eastern North Atlantic, with a world synopsis of genera., Bulletin of the British Museum, Natural History (Zoology) 42: 37-148
Cory, Robert L. (1967) Epifauna of the Patuxent River Estuary, Chesapeake Science 8: 71-89
Fraser, C. McLean (1937) Hydroids of the Pacific Coast of Canada and the United States., , Toronto,. Pp.
Fraser, C. McLean (1944) Hydroids of the Atlantic Coast of North America, In: (Eds.) . , Toronto. Pp. 1-441
Humphries, Edythe M.; Duedall, Iver W.; Jordan, Stephen J. (1985) Coal-waste blocks as a fouling substrate in estuarine water., In: (Eds.) Energy Wastes in the Ocean. , New York. Pp. 613-649
Mergner, H., Wedler, E. (1977) Uber die hydropolypenfauna des Roten Meeres und seiner Ausgange., 'Meteor' Forschungen-Ergebnisse 24: 1-32
Millard, N. A. H. (1959) Hydrozoa from ships' hulls and experimental plates in Cape Town docks., Annals of the South African Museum 45: 239-255
Millard, N. A. H. (1975) Monograph on the Hydroida of southern Africa, Annals of the South African Museum 68: 1-513
Watson, Jeanette E. (1995) New records and redescriptions of thecate hydroids from southern Australia, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 106: 147-162