Description
Common Names- The name 'Tiger Muskie' is sometimes used for a color variant of Esox masquinongy, but usually refers to the hybrid Esox lucius X Esox masquinongy (Scott and Crossman 1973).
Potentially Misidentified Species- Esox lucius X Esox masquinongy is a sterile artificial hybrid. E. reicherti (Amur Pike) is native to Asia (Russia, China) and was introduced to Glendale Lake (PA) in the Susquehanna drainage. It has not been reported from the river proper (Denoncourt et al. 1975b), and is considered a failed introduction (Courtenay et al. 1984).
Taxonomy
Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animalia | Chordata | Osteichthyes | Salmoniformes | Esocidae | Esox |
Synonyms
Invasion History
Chesapeake Bay Status
First Record | Population | Range | Introduction | Residency | Source Region | Native Region | Vectors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1973 | Established | Stable | Introduced | Boundary Resident | North America | North America | Fisheries(Fisheries Intentional) |
History of Spread
Esox masquinongy's (Muskellunge) native range was 'originally St. Lawrence-Great Lakes, Hudson Bay (Red River) and Mississippi River basins from Quebec to southeast Manitoba, south in the Appalachians to GA, and in the west to IA' (Page and Burr 1991). It is probably introduced in VA's Ohio drainages and elsewhere in VA (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). Esox masquinongy are frequently introduced in Atlantic drainages, and south and west of their native range, but seldom successfully. Altogether, they have been introduced to 28 states (Fuller et al. 1999; Page and Burr 1991; Scott and Crossman 1973).
Widespread stocking in the Chesapeake Basin apparently began in 1960's in PA (Fowler 1948) and later in MD and VA. Most stocked fish came from the OH drainage (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). In VA and most of MD this species appears to be largely or wholly confined to reservoirs (Lee et al. 1981; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). Esox masquinongy in our area appear to be largely dependent on stocking, but small juveniles have been seen in the upper James VA (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993) and Susquehanna Rivers PA (Mangan 1986). Riverine populations occur in the Susquehanna (Bielo 1963; Denoncourt and Cooper 1975; Mangan 1986; McKeown 1984) and in the Delaware Estuary (Horowitz 1986; Raasch and Altemus 1991).
James River- Esox masquinongy have been caught in Richmond, at the head of tidal waters (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993).
Potomac River - Esox masquinongy are stocked in Piedmont streams and impoundments; some still survive in Burke Lake, Fairfax County VA (Ernst et al. 1995). Muskellunge have been caught just above the tidal region as recently as 2009 (Starnes et al. 2011).
Susquehanna River - Attempts by the PA Fish Commission at extending the range of Esox masquinongy in PA began in 1953, and introductions to the Susquehanna started in the 1960's (Mangan 1986). Bielo's (1963) survey found E. masquinongy's only in the Northern PA sections of the river, but it was recorded in Susquehanna and Conowingo Reservoir (1973-75) (Denoncourt and Cooper 1975), and found below Conowingo Dam in 1972-84 (McKeown 1984). A few juveniles have been found in the Susquehanna (Mangan 1986). PA has stopped stocking of esocids in the Susquehanna (McLean 1999, personal communication).
Delaware River- Esox masquinongy were introduced in Wayne County PA by 1919 (Fowler 1919; 1948). They were stocked in Brandywine Creek PA in 1964-65 and caught in DE by 1967-68. Muskellunge are dependent on stocking in Delaware Estuary. The 'Tiger Musky' Esox lucius X Esox masquinongy was stocked in larger numbers (Horwitz 1986; Raasch and Altemus 1991). Stocking of Esox masquinongy has been stopped in the Delaware River (Raasch 1997).
History References - Bielo 1963; Denoncourt and Cooper 1975; Denoncourt et al. 1975b; Ernst et al. 1995; Fowler 1919; Fowler 1948; Fuller et al. 1999; Horwitz 1986; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Lee et al. 1981; Mangan 1986; McLean 1999 personal communication; ; McKeown 1984; Raasch 1996; Raasch and Altemus 1991; Scott and Crossman 1973
Invasion Comments
Ecology
Environmental Tolerances
For Survival | For Reproduction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum | Maximum | Minimum | Maximum | |
Temperature (ºC) | 0.0 | 32.0 | 9.4 | 14.0 |
Salinity (‰) | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
Oxygen | ||||
pH | ||||
Salinity Range | fresh-oligo |
Age and Growth
Male | Female | |
---|---|---|
Minimum Adult Size (mm) | ||
Typical Adult Size (mm) | ||
Maximum Adult Size (mm) | ||
Maximum Longevity (yrs) | ||
Typical Longevity (yrs |
Reproduction
Start | Peak | End | |
---|---|---|---|
Reproductive Season | |||
Typical Number of Young Per Reproductive Event |
|||
Sexuality Mode(s) | |||
Mode(s) of Asexual Reproduction |
|||
Fertilization Type(s) | |||
More than One Reproduction Event per Year |
|||
Reproductive Startegy | |||
Egg/Seed Form |
Impacts
Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay
Esox masquinongy (Muskellunge) may be (or have been) an important gamefish in the nontidal Susquehanna, and reservoirs in the watershed, if abundance permits (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Lee et al. 1981; Raasch and Altemus 1991). The discontinuation of stocking in the Susquehanna means that abundance of this species is likely to decline in this river. However, stocking continues in Virginia drainages. This fish probably has few or no economic impacts on native biota in the Chesapeake Bay proper.
References- Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Lee et al. 1981; Raasch and Altemus 1991
Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay
Esox masquinongy (Muskellunge) is one of North America's premier sportfish, prized both for large size and agressiveness (Scott and Crossman 1973). It has been introduced to watersheds in 39 states, and has become established in some of those (Fuller et al. 1999). Esox masquinongy were stocked in PA waters of the Delaware River estuary from the 1960s to the early 1990s, but are declining with the cessation of releases (Raasch 1997).
References- Fuller et al. 1999; Raasch 1997; Scott and Crossman 1973
Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species
Esox masquinongy (Muskellunge) appears to be confined to the Susquehanna and James Rivers (McKeown 1984; Pavol and Davis 1982; Raasch and Altemus 1991) and reservoirs around the Coastal Plain (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). Since reproduction is rare in the Susquehanna and elsewhere in the Chesapeake region (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Mangan 1986), this species is dependent on stocking. Stocking has ceased in PA, but continues in VA (Christmas et al. 2000). Significant impacts on native fishes are unlikely in tidal waters.
References - Christmas et al. 2000; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Mangan 1986; McKeown 1984; Pavol and Davis 1982; Raasch and Altemus 1991
Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species
Esox masquinongy (Muskellunge) appears to be confined to the Susquehanna and James Rivers (McKeown 1984; Pavol and Davis 1982; Raasch and Altemus 1991) and reservoirs around the Coastal Plain (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). Since reproduction is rare in the Susquehanna and elsewhere in the Chesapeake region (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Mangan 1986), this species is dependent on stocking. Stocking has ceased in PA, but continues in VA (Christmas et al. 2000). Significant impacts on native fishes are unlikely in tidal waters.
References - Christmas et al. 2000; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Mangan 1986; McKeown 1984; Pavol and Davis 1982; Raasch and Altemus 1991
References
Becker, George C. (1983) Fishes of Wisconsin, , Madison. Pp.Bielo, Robert J. (1963) A fishery investigation of the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania, In: (Eds.) . , Newark. Pp.
Carlander, Kenneth D. (1969) Handbook of freshwater fishery biology. Vol. 1., In: (Eds.) . , Ames. Pp.
Christmas, John and 7 authors. (1998) History, management, and status of introduced fishes in the Chesapeake Bay basin., In: Therres, Glenn D.(Eds.) Conservation of Biological Diversity: A Key to Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and Beyond.. , Annapolis. Pp. 97-116
Courtenay, Walter R., Jr.; Hensley, Dannie A.; Taylor, Jeffrey; McCann, James A. (1984) Distribution of exotic fishes in the continental United States., In: Courtenay, Walter R., and Stauffer, Jay R.(Eds.) Distribution, Biology, and Management of Exotic Fishes. , Baltimore, MD. Pp.
Denoncourt, Robert F.; Robbins, Timothy W.; Hesser, Robert (1975) Recent introductions and reintroductions to the Pennsylvania fish fauna of the Susquehanna River drainage above Conowingo Dam, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 49: 57-58
Denoncourt, Robert F.; Cooper, Edwin L. (1975) A review of the literature and checklist of fishes of the Susquehanna River drainage above Conowingo Dam, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 49: 121-125
Ernst, Carl H.; Wilgenbusch, James C.,; Morgan, Donald L.; Boucher, Timothy P.; Sommerfield, Mark (1995) Fishes of Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Maryland Naturalist 39: 1-60
Fowler, Henry W. (1919) A list of the fishes of Pennsylvania, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 32: 49-74
Fowler, Henry W. (1948) A list of the fishes of Pennsylvania., Bulletin of the Board of Fish Commisioners, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 7: 1-26
Fuller, Pam. L.; Nico, Leo; Williams, J. D. (1999) Nonindigenous fishes introduced into inland waters of the United States, , Bethesda MD. Pp.
Horwitz, Richard J. (1986) Fishes of the Delaware estuary in Pennsylvania., In: Majundar, S.K., Brenner, F. J., Rhoads, A. F.(Eds.) Endangered and Threatened Species Programs in Pennsylvania.. , Philadelphia. Pp. 177-201
Jenkins, Robert E.; Burkhead, Noel M. (1993) Freshwater fishes of Virginia., , Bethesda, MD. Pp.
Lee, David S.; Platania, S. P.; Gilbert, Carter R.; Franz, Richard; Norden, Arnold (1981) A revised list of the freshwater fishes of Maryland and Delaware, Proceedings of the Southeastern Fishes Council 3: 1-9
Mangan, Brian P. (1986) Natural reproduction of the muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) in the Susquehanna River, near Berwick, Pennsylvania, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 60: 200
McKeown, Paul E. (1984) Additions to ichthyofauna of the Susquehanna River with a checklist of fishes of the Susquehanna River drainage below Conowingo Dam, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 58: 187-192
Page, Lawrence M.; Burr, Brooks M. (1991) Freshwater Fishes., , Boston. Pp.
Pavol, Kenneth W.; Davis, Robert W. (1982) An investigation of the smallmouth bass in the Susquehanna River below Conowingo Dam, F-29R , Annapolis MD. Pp.
Raasch, Maynard S. (1996) Delaware's Freshwater and Brackish Water Fishes: A Popular Account., , Neptune, NJ. Pp.
Raasch, Maynard S.; Altemus, Vaughn L., Sr. (1991) Delaware's freshwater and brackish water fishes: a popular account, , Wilmingotn, Delaware. Pp.
Scott, W. B.; Crossman, E. J. (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada, , Ottawa. Pp.
Starnes, Wayne C. (2002) Current diversity, historical analysis, and biotic integrity of fishes in the lower Potomac basin in the vicinity of Plummers Island, MD, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 115: 273-320