Description
Other Taxonomic Groupings - A cultivated variety was known as the 'golden tench' (Baughman 1947).
Taxonomy
Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animalia | Chordata | Osteichthyes | Cypriniformes | Cyprinidae | Tinca |
Synonyms
Invasion History
Chesapeake Bay Status
First Record | Population | Range | Introduction | Residency | Source Region | Native Region | Vectors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1882 | Extinct | Contracting | Introduced | Regular Resident | Europe | Eurasia | Fisheries(Fisheries Intentional) |
History of Spread
Tinca tinca (Tench) is native to Western Europe, except Northern Scandinavia, and probably the British Isles. The likely native range includes the Baltic, Caspian and Black Sea Basins, Caucasus, and east to Ob & Yenisei Rivers and Lake Baikal (Courtenay et al. 1984). They were introduced into ponds in Druid Hill Park, Baltimore MD, by the United States Fish Commission (USFC) in 1877 (Baughman 1947), and later reared in the USFC hatchery in Washington DC. 138,000 T. tinca were distributed to private applicants and rivers in 32 states in 1894, including MD, DC, and VA. Tinca tinca were introduced from Italy to CA in 1922 by a farm pond owner (Baughman 1947). The present status of T. tinca in North America is somewhat uncertain, but populations may persist in one CT lake, and in CA, CO, ID, OR, WA and British Columbia (Courtenay et al. 1984; Fuller et al. 1999; Lever 1996; Page and Burr 1991). A population is apparently established and spreading in the Richelieu River, Quebec (Societe de la faune de des parcs Quebec 2002).
Tinca tinca escaped from the USFC hatchery into the Potomac River in 1889 during floods (Baird 1893). However, some apparently escaped before then, since one was collected in Broad Creek,VA, a Potomac tributary in 1882 (U.S. National Museum of Natural History 2001). Smith and Bean (1898) wrote 'Escaped into the Potomac and now becoming common. Some are sent to market from district waters.' Tinca tinca were stocked in the Delaware River tributaries (1888-93), in the Patuxent (1888-89), the Susquehanna (PA, 1888-89), and the Appomattox (James River drainage, 1891-92). Altogether, 8,064 Tinca tinca were planted in Chesapeake tributaries (Baughman 1947). Many years later, fish may have escaped from fish-farming operations into the Monocacy River at Thurmont MD. However, there are no records from the Chesapeake drainage since 1911 (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Musick 1972a; Schwartz 1964). Tinca tinca were established and causing problems before 1947 in Deep Creek Lake MD (Ohio drainage), but were reduced or eliminated by stocking Micropterus salmoides (Baughman 1947).
Baughman (1947) sugested that the T. tinca was unable to coexist with centrarchid predators, particularly Micropterus spp. ('black basses'), but also Lepomis gulosus (Warmouth) and Lepomis cyanellus (Green Sunfish). 'Most of the states in which planting was done lie within the Micropterus spp. belt of the United States, and it seems reasonable to believe that a fish such as the tench would hardly be able to gain a foothold and thrive in the face of such opposition. In western states, they seemed to do better where salmonids were the chief predators' (Baughman 1947).
Tinca tinca have been introduced to the British Isles (probably), Norway, Finland, India, Indonesia, southern Africa, Australia and New Zealand (Baughman 1947; Lever 1996).
History References - Baird 1893; Baughman 1947; Cadwallader 1977; Courtenay et al. 1984; Fuller et al. 1999; Lever 1996; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Musick 1972a; Schwartz 1963; Schwartz 1964; Smith and Bean 1898; Societe de la faune de des parcs Quebec 2002; U.S. National Museum of Natural History 2001
Invasion Comments
Ecology
Environmental Tolerances
For Survival | For Reproduction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum | Maximum | Minimum | Maximum | |
Temperature (ºC) | 39.0 | |||
Salinity (‰) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | |
Oxygen | ||||
pH | ||||
Salinity Range | fresh-oligo |
Age and Growth
Male | Female | |
---|---|---|
Minimum Adult Size (mm) | ||
Typical Adult Size (mm) | ||
Maximum Adult Size (mm) | ||
Maximum Longevity (yrs) | ||
Typical Longevity (yrs |
Reproduction
Start | Peak | End | |
---|---|---|---|
Reproductive Season | |||
Typical Number of Young Per Reproductive Event |
|||
Sexuality Mode(s) | |||
Mode(s) of Asexual Reproduction |
|||
Fertilization Type(s) | |||
More than One Reproduction Event per Year |
|||
Reproductive Startegy | |||
Egg/Seed Form |
Impacts
Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay
Tinca tinca (Tench) appeared in the markets in Washington after its introduction to the Potomac (Smith and Bean 1898), but eventually disappeared in the Potomac. They were later reared commercially in ponds along the Monocacy River, Thurmont MD, but there have been no wild records in the Chesapeake Basin since 1911 (Baughman 1947; Schwartz 1964). However, they may still be reared as an ornamental in the watershed.
References - Baughman 1947; Smith and Bean 1898; Schwartz 1964
Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay
Tinca tinca (Tench) is a popular food and sport fish in Europe, with a reputation for hardiness (Baughman 1947; Courtenay et al. 1984). Introduced populations in North America were largely unsuccessful, but some populations persisted in CA, ID, and WA and were sold locally in markets as 'Idaho Bass' (Baughman 1947). Currently, this fish has no economic importance in North America (Fuller et al. 1999; Lever 1996). It has been introduced to India, Indonesia, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. In many of these countries, it seems to have no economic importance. In New Zealand, it is both regarded as a minor pest and a popular sportfish (Lever 1996).
References - Baughman 1947; Courtenay et al. 1984; Fuller et al. 1999; Lever 1996
Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species
Tinca tinca (Tench) apparently survived in the Potomac for some years after their introduction (Smith and Bean 1898), but apparently had little impact on Chesapeake ecosystems. In the 1940s, Tinca tinca reached high abundances in reservoirs in MD (Deep Creek Lake, Ohio drainage) and ID , and were regarded as a nuisance (Baughman 1947), but it is now considered to be extinct in the draiange (Fuller et al. 1999).
References- Baughman 1947; Fuller et al. 1999; Smith and Bean 1898
Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species
Tinca tinca (Tench) apparently survived in the Potomac for some years after their introduction (Smith and Bean 1898), but apparently had little impact on Chesapeake ecosystems. Baughman (1947) has suggested that one reason for their extinction might have been a lack of defenses against Micropterus salmoides (Largemouth Bass).
References - Baughman 1947; Smith and Bean 1898
References
Baird, Spencer F. (1893) United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries, Report of the Commissioner, for 1889, part 14., In: (Eds.) Report of the Commissioner, United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries for 1889 to 1891. , Washington, D.C.. Pp.Baughman, J. L. (1947) The tench in America, journal of Wildlife Management 11: 197-204
Cadwallader, P. L. (1977) Introduction of Rudd, Scardinius erythropthalmus into New Zealand 1. Review of the ecology of rudd and the implications of its introduction into New Zealand, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fisheries Technical Report 147: 1-18
Courtenay, Walter R., Jr.; Hensley, Dannie A.; Taylor, Jeffrey; McCann, James A. (1984) Distribution of exotic fishes in the continental United States., In: Courtenay, Walter R., and Stauffer, Jay R.(Eds.) Distribution, Biology, and Management of Exotic Fishes. , Baltimore, MD. Pp.
Fuller, Pam. L.; Nico, Leo; Williams, J. D. (1999) Nonindigenous fishes introduced into inland waters of the United States, , Bethesda MD. Pp.
Horoszewicz, Lidia (1973) Lethal and 'disturbing' temperatures in some fish species from lakes with normal and artificially elevated temperature, Journal of Fish Biology 5: 165-181
Jenkins, Robert E.; Burkhead, Noel M. (1993) Freshwater fishes of Virginia., , Bethesda, MD. Pp.
Lever, Christopher (1996) Naturalized fishes of the world., , London, England. Pp.
Musick, J. A.; Wiley, Martin L. (1972) Fishes of Chesapeake Bay and the adjacent coastal plain, Special Scientific Report, Virginia Institute of Marine Science 65: 175-212
Page, Lawrence M.; Burr, Brooks M. (1991) Freshwater Fishes., , Boston. Pp.
Schwartz, Frank J. (1963) The freshwater minnows of Maryland, Maryland Conservationist 40: 19-29
Schwartz, Frank J. (1964) Several Maryland fishes are close to extinction, Maryland Conservationist 61: 8-12
Smith, Hugh M.; Bean, Barton A. (1898) List of fishes known to inhabit the waters of the District of Columbia and vicinity., Bulletin of the U. S. Fish Commission 18: 179-187
2002 [Aquatic Nuisance Species of Quebec] Les Especes Aquatiques Nuisibles Au Quebec. http://www.fapaq.gouv.qc.ca/fr/faune/nuisibles/index.htm (1999)
1996-2014 NMNH Fish Collection Database.. http://collections.nmnh.si.edu/search/fishes/
Worth, S. G. (1895) A review of the history and results of the attempts to acclimatize fish and other water animals in the Pacific states, In: (Eds.) Report of the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries for 1893. , Washington D.C.. Pp. 78-138